Product Description
The 1990, ninth edition, of Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised is the only currently authoritative volume to contain the complete Robert’s Rules of Order subject matter. It has been totally reset and redesigned for easier use. This ninth edition supersedes all previous editions and automatically becomes the parliamentary authority in organizations whose bylaws prescribe Robert’s Rules of Order.This edition has been updated to address common inquiries, and i… More >>
Tags: authoritative volume, bylaws, ninth edition, parliamentary authority, previous editions, robert s rules of order, rules of order, subject matter
This is the one indispensable book to have at all of your meetings. In over 20 years of being a parliamentarian and 15 years as a teacher of Rules of Order, I have not found a better reference. If you’re just learning, you might want to get a simpler, abridged version as a primer – just to let you know what is most important. It won’t be long, however, before you’ll want this book to use as a real tool to help meetings run more efficiently, in a shorter period of time and with a minimum of disagreements. It will also help you with those “problem” people at meetings. If you don’t know Rules of Order you’re at the mercy of those who do, or more often, those who pretend to.
Rating: 5 / 5
As a lawyer, when I am asked about proper procedure at a meeting, my first question is: What rules do you use? Is there an applicable statute, or bylaws or rules that the organization has adopted? Nine times out of ten, the answer is: “Robert’s Rules of Order.” Robert’s is the most widely used parliamentary manual in the United States.
General Henry M. Robert published the original “Robert’s Rules” in 1875 and 1876 and, since the copyright on that edition (and the next few editions) has long since expired, there are numerous unofficial editions on the market. The third edition, published in 1893, is still marketed in paperback by more than one publisher as the “original” Robert’s Rules. With the copyright expired, even the name “Robert’s” has passed into the public domain, and many imitators have slapped the name “Robert’s” on books of parliamentary procedure that bear minimal relation to General Robert’s work (much as many dictionaries claim the name “Webster’s” without any connection to Noah Webster or the Merriam-Webster brand that carries on his work). This book is the real Robert’s, composed by an editorial board appointed by General Robert’s heirs (including his descendants Sarah and Henry III, both eminent parliamentarians). Now in its tenth edition, published in 2000, this book “supersedes all previous editions and is intended automatically become the parliamentary authority in organizations whose bylaws prescribe ‘Robert’s Rules of Order’ . . . or the like, without specifying a particular edition.”
Robert’s is not necessarily the best parliamentary manual on the market: “Modern Parliamentary Procedure” by Ray Keesey is far more logical and user-friendly, and “The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure” by Alice Sturgis (commissioned by the American Institute of Parliamentarians as a contemporary alternative to Robert’s) is more readable and more rooted in modern practice. But no other book has gained as much as a toehold in Robert’s dominance in the market. If you are interested in parliamentary procedure, or figuring out how most organizations work in the twenty-first-century United States, this Robert’s is indispensable.
Rating: 5 / 5
I first came into contact with this book during the summer between my freshman and sophomore years of high school. I was going to be participating in something called Student Congress in the fall, and although I had never heard of it before, all of my teachers and teamates told me to get a copy of Robert’s Rules. Not knowing of any of the “watered down” versions that existed, I simply purchased the official copy. Having cut my teeth on that copy (dutifully reading the entire book that summer) I have little sympathy for people who shy away from it because it’s too complicated
But honestly, this book has become a source of pride to me. Although I have been criticized for perhaps too zealously insisting on adhering to the rules in the book, I am also accepted as a Parliamentary expert and some have remarked I know more than the Parliamentarians who run our exercise (although I would be loathe to admit that, they are very intelligent people). Anyway, given a proper forum Robert’s Rules of Order have been a very rewarding thing for me, as they have given me something to study and learn and be recognized at, and I intend on buying all future editions of the text to make sure I stay on top of any developments. Truly the best book of its kind!
Rating: 5 / 5
Question: Which edition of Robert’s Rules is official? Aren’t they all the same? Which one do professional parliamentarians refer to? Answer: The National Association of Parliamentarians, and the American Institute of Parliamentarians, only recognize one book as the current official parliamentary authority: Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised [2000 tenth edition, Perseus] Everything else is old, or a variation. The bible of parliamentary law, it is this edition that your bylaws probably mentions, not the 1876 original text, like some publishers are selling. Be forewarned, it is literally a book of rules, and not easily absorbed. — You may have to learn what’s practical for your average meeting by a simpler beginners book. If you want simple, go elsewhere; if you want complete, this is it. No other book is ADDING things to Henry M. Robert’s original classifications & rankings (it’s 700+ pages!), only shortening & simplifying & rephrasing.
Rating: 5 / 5
Many people will recommed other parliamentary authorities whose primary benefit is that of being shorter. Other authorities I’ve read (“21st Century Robert’s Rules” and “Riddick’s Rules of Procedure”) are shorter because they’ve left out substantial parts, or don’t include useful examples.
Some other authorities, like Ray Keesey’s “Modern Parliamentary Procedure” do not actually reflect current (or past) parliamentary practice, but attempt to redefine procedure based on the author’s own bias. Robert’s Rules are more obviously the result of centuries of practice, and use.
This book will not get you up and running overnight, but it is indispensable to anyone with a desire for a comprehensive understanding of parliamentary law. And even though it is a more massive work, part of the extra material is instructive on shortening your meetings by acting more efficiently without abridging anyone’s rights.
Rating: 5 / 5