Product Description
From the celebrated and controversial attorney, Harvard Law School professor, bestselling author, and O.J. trial insider comes a searching and provocative book on the most famous case of the century–the book for those who believe that O.J. Simpson killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman and that the verdict was a gross miscarriage of justice. of photos.Amazon.com Review
Alan Dershowitz, arguably one of the foremost legal thinkers of our time, give… More >>
REASONABLE DOUBTS: The O.J. Simpson Case and the Criminal Justice System
Tags: criminal justice system, harvard law school, law school professor, legal thinkers, nicole brown simpson, nicole brown simpson and ronald goldman, o j simpson, reasonable doubts
The testimony of the two witnesses who cannot lie say that OJ Simpson is not guilty.
Blood and flesh were found under Nicole Brown’s fingernails; the blood type did not match OJ (or Nicole or Ron). Ron Goldman walked to work, worked out, and practiced karate; his hands showed bruises from punching someone in the face or head more than once. OJ had no scratches or bruises on his hands, arms, face, or body: he could not have been a lone murderer.
The newspapers said that when the bodies were found after 12:15 AM their red blood was trickling down the sidewalk. The crime scene pictures printed in the National Enquirer showed the red blood. This says they were freshly killed, around 11:30, because their blood would be black and clotted if dead for over an hour (as in the Borden Murders).
The above physical evidence proves OJ Simpson to be innocent of these murders. Some say the 25 to 30 stab wounds on Ron Goldman suggest an emotional frenzy from a personal enemy, and Nicole Brown was the innocent bystander. The book “Killing Time” is the first and only objective book (arguments for both sides) to discuss all the evidence.
I hope that those who want to know the facts will read this, and reconsider any prejudgments that they made in June 1994.
Rating: 5 / 5
OJ Simpson – Not Guilty
The testimony of the two witnesses who cannot lie say that OJ Simpson is not guilty.
Blood and flesh were found under Nicole Brown’s fingernails; the blood type did not match OJ (or Nicole or Ron). Ron Goldman walked to work, worked out, and practiced karate; his hands showed bruises from punching someone in the face or head more than once. OJ had no scratches or bruises on his hands, arms, face, or body: he could not have been a lone murderer.
The newspapers said that when the bodies were found after 12:15 AM their red blood was trickling down the sidewalk. The crime scene pictures printed in the National Enquirer showed the red blood. This says they were freshly killed, around 11:30, because their blood would be black and clotted if dead for over an hour (as in the Borden Murders).
The above physical evidence proves OJ Simpson to be innocent of these murders. Some say the 25 to 30 stab wounds on Ron Goldman suggest an emotional frenzy from a personal enemy, and Nicole Brown was the innocent bystander. The book “Killing Time” is the first and only objective book (arguments for both sides) to discuss all the evidence.
I hope that those who want to know the facts will read this, and reconsider any prejudgments that they made in June 1994.
Rating: 4 / 5
I used this book to portray argue oj as a good person and to alter the image the media has of him in one of my english classes it was a great resource
Rating: 5 / 5
This is just another lawyer capitalizing on the infamy of this trial to make a ton of money. He doesn’t even try to convince of O.J.’s innocence because that would be impossible.
Regarding the two pieces of evidence the other reviewer mentioned ‘proving’ O.J.’s innocence, neither is pertinent. Neither was featured prominently by the defense, nor mentioned by the jurors as a reason for acquittal. The defense itself put the time of the murders at 10:45, rendering the ‘red blood”evidence’ as unimportant since their OWN time-line would have been made a lie of. The blood under the fingernails was degraded blood which can not be typed-but the fingers were found in a pool of her own blood making it extraordinarily likely that it was her own blood.
Consider the following:
–Simpson had a fresh cut on his finger and his blood was found in his home, in the Bronco and at Nicole’s residence. If he hadn’t had a cut big enough to bleed there would have been no case. A pretty extraordinary coincidence.
–Simpson had been given gloves, like the ones found, by Nicole and had been photographed wearing them. He said he had never owned those “ugly as# shoes” (Bruno Magli) but then a photo was found with him wearing those exact shoes. He had bought a knife the size of the one used, which was never found.
–The limo driver never saw a white Bronco before 11:00 despite going to both entrances. He rang the door bell many times but received no answer until almost 11:00.
–Kato heard a VERY loud bump behind his room at the very time Simpson was alleged to have been there, and at the exact place where the glove was found.
–MANY police officers were alleged to have been in on the ‘plot’, but neither the defense nor Simpson ever pushed for an investigation, nor did they put any effort into finding the ‘real’ killer.
–Furman, the supposed ‘leader’ of the plot, only arrived long after many other police officers, none of which saw a second glove at the crime scene.
This is only the tip of the iceberg but should be enough to convince any honest person. One of the real low points in U.S. legal history.
Rating: 1 / 5
The book is a bore. A Harvard law professor attemptsto rationalize how OJ couldn’t be convicted of killing his wife and a third party. Alan attemptsto find a way reasonable doubts exist according tohis twisted view of the facts. After this case peoplehave stopped listening to his fictional ideas
Rating: 1 / 5