Law Insight

Product Description
This text explores how jurors try to do justice in the wake of accidents, and reveals much about the overall psychology of jury decision-making. Neal Feigenson, a professor of law, offers a framework for how jurors deploy their common sense, together with the law and the facts, to produce what the author refers to as “total justice”. Feigenson analyzes both the words lawyers use to help jurors assign blame and the words jurors themselves use as they make decisions. … More >>

» Read more: Legal Blame: How Jurors Think and Talk About Accidents

Related posts

• Winning at Trial
• What Your Divorce Lawyer May Not Tell You: The 125 Questions Every Woman Should Ask
• What Every Woman Should Know About Divorce and Custody : Judges, Lawyers, and Therapists Share Winning Strategies on How toKeep the Kids, the Cash, and Your Sanity
• Wetland Indicators: A Guide to Wetland Identification, Delineation, Classification, and Mapping
• Wet Growth: Should Water Law Control Land Use?